Mary McCusker (asker) Sep 27, 2010:

Both responses helpful Thanks, Sanjay and Opolt - both responses and the links cited have been helpful for the translation overall.

opolt Sep 27, 2010:

@Sanjay There seems to be some confusion here ... On the surface, your answer is not much different from mine, but please note that according to the asker, this is related to pollution. However the documents you're linking to don't talk about pollution related technology at all; namely droplet content in inlet air coolers of gas turbines is a problem for the turbine blades (erosion or worse), not for the environment (it's just destilled water ...).

Anyway, for Mary all this should be proof enough that "droplet content" and similar terms do exist (but probably not "drop content" -- not only because those drops are very tiny, but also because '"drop" could be confusing due to its double meaning).

Mary McCusker (asker) Sep 27, 2010:

Context Unfortunately, there is no more context. This is simply a defining term from a list of pollutants. It is not "Restgehalt an tropfenförmiger Schmutzfracht" or "restlicher Schmutzanteil in Tropfen" - it is Resttropfengehalt.

opolt Sep 26, 2010:

More context please I mean, "remaining (liquid) drop(let) content" sounds possible to me, but how about telling us a bit more about the context? The thing is, a power station may emit pollutants in a quite a number of different ways.

I suppose this is related to flue gas? Is this about a desulphurization plant? If yes, which technology does it use? Which agents to remove SO2?