Che contiene l'eventualità che non ci sia scambio di denaro o altra considerazione. Altrimenti userebbero "sell".

Da quel poco che ci hai dato direi così.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2015-05-19 10:39:26 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

If there was an exchange for money, it was sold. If no money is involved, but there was an exchange of goods, then it was traded. If it was simply handed over from one person to the other, then it was given. per aver ceduto a xxx sostanza stupefacente = because he gave xxxx the narcotic drug.

A suggestion which may cover all eventualities.
To hand over drugs indicates the physical act of giving the drug into the possession of another person, whether for payment or not.
The law varies considerably from country to country in the level of penalty applied and what "supply" is deemed to be.

= "per aver ceduto a xxx sostanza stupefacente"

- this covers all possibilites:selling it to her/him, slipping it into her/his pocket , sticking it up her/his nose, or otherwise putting it into her/his possession

Immigrant Legal Resource Center, www.ilrc.org § N.8 Controlled Substances
November 2015
32
ENDNOTES -- Effect of Selected Drug Convictions in Ninth Circuit

1
Prepared by Kathy Brady of the Immigrant Legal Resource Center. See further discussion in Brady,
Tooby, Mehr, Junck, Defending Immigrants in the Ninth Circuit (2013) (www.ilrc.org), Ch. 3 and
California Quick Reference Chart and Notes, and Note: Controlled Substances, at www.ilrc.org/crimes,
and Tooby, Brady, California Criminal Defense of Immigrants (www.ceb.org).
2
Nunez-Reyes v. Holder, 646 F.3d 684 (9th Cir. July 14, 2011) (en banc) reversed Lujan-Armendariz v.
INS, 222 F.3d 728 (9th Cir. 2000), prospectively only. See Nunez-Reyes Advisory at www.ilrc.org/crimes.
3 Mellouli v. Lynch, 135 S. Ct. 1980, 1982 (2015).
4
This plea will help a permanent resident or refugee who is not already deportable (e.g., no prior
deportable conviction) to avoid becoming deportable, because ICE cannot prove that the substance is one
from the federal schedules. Seek a record of conviction that refers only to “a controlled substance” rather
than “cocaine.” See Ruiz-Vidal, 473 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2007) (where Cal. H&S C §11377 conviction
record does not ID specific substance, offense is not a deportable drug conviction); Esquivel-Garcia, 594
F.3d 1025 (2010) (same for § 11350); Matter of Paulus, 11 I&N Dec. 274 (BIA 1965). A plea to an
unspecified controlled substance will not prevent the conviction from being a bar to status or relief,
however. See Young v. Holder, 697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). The Ninth Circuit might change
the Young rule in is en banc review of Almanza-Arenas v. Holder, pending at this writing.
5
A single conviction for simple possession 30 grams or less, or use, of marijuana, is not a deportable
conviction under 8 USC §1227(a)(2)(B), and might be subject to inadmissibility waiver under 8 USC
§1182(h). The same is true for an equivalent quantity of hashish (for inadmissibility waiver purposes, i.e.
a few grams) and 30 grams or less of hashish (for deportability purposes; but by far the best plea is to
possessing a few grams). See Note: Controlled Substances, Part III, above.
6
Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006) (first state possession offense is not an aggravated felony
because it would not be punishable as a felony under federal law). But see note 8.
Second such offense YES NO NO
Sale of a specified CS;
Sale of paraphernalia
to use a specified CS
(check statute)
YES YES NO
Offer to sell or to
commit other drug
offense (specified CS)
YES unless “generic
solicitation”13
NO14 but only in imm
proceedings held in
the Ninth Circuit
NO
Give away small
amount of marijuana YES
NO, as long as
minimum conduct
ever prosecuted
includes giving away
30 gms or less15
SHOULD BE16
Possession for Sale
(of a specified CS)