is the EPO legalese

Ref: 15 years work for EPO

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2003-02-25 15:50:27 (GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

from a letter of a US patent attorney:

\"Therefore, it is considered that a skilled practioner knowing D1 was given no hint to devlop a process for ..................as recited in claim 1 of the patent-in-suit.\"Dated 9.1.01

Slightly different spelling that I had above.

See also:

6,157,946 (\"946\" Patent\" or \"patent-in-suit\") entitled \"Information Providing
System For Providing Images Suitable For User, And Terminal Of Information ...
www.techlawjournal.com/courts2000/ netzero_juno/20001226com.asp -
and

e Court May Find the Patent in Suit Invalid in an Infringement Case,
the Supreme Court Says. On April 11, 2000, the Supreme Court ...
www.asahi-net.or.jp/~VK3K-KNDU/invalidity.htm

and

ase comment: Omark Industries v. Gouger Saw Chain - [ Diese Seite übersetzen ]
... Summary. Facts. The Decision. At p. 218, 219: \"This now brings me to deal with
defendants\' attack on the patent in suit on the basis of lack of invention. ...
www.jurisdiction.com/omark.htm -