I'll kick off, then duck. 11:19 Oct 25, 2010
There seems to be a fairly solid concensus on photography before cinema in (for argument's sake) high-brow circles. Amongst those at the more - I'm going to risk stirring up a hornet's nest here - low-brow/popular end of the arts, it seems to be television or even video games, leaving out photography, at least according to the great Gogol. The arts have long been a favourite battle ground for the class war, and as photography has been so universally embraced, available to all levels of society, kicking it into the long grass seems an odd and ungrateful thing to do. Is this a rejection of "arty-farty" photography as elitist or what? As one of the "arty-farty-photo" crowd, my vote's firmly for photography. The French list is interestingly argued, but without photography, there would be no cinema or television and only the French would think of putting the bande dessinée. Cinema is worth of inclusion, but only if theatre is in there too.<p>I'm writing this quickly because my brioche dough is nearly risen, so please don't ask me to give 3 reasons and draw a map!<p>Maybe the real eighth art is that of diplomatic translation!<p> Provocatively yours, Alison |