English term
peace
Non-PRO (1): DTSM
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Мир
Афоризмы и цитаты Махатмы
мир (мирно сосуществование)
мир
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2020-11-03 14:11:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
нет пути к миру, сам мир и есть путь
да, но потерялась лаконичность |
см.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 23 мин (2020-11-03 14:18:46 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
или
Нет иного пути к соблюдению мира/общественного порядка, чем само мирное сосуществование/соблюдение общественного порядка
Чтобы перестать воевать, недостаточно заключить перемирие; необходимо научиться мирно жить.
A. J. Muste was rumored to have coined the phrase, "There is no way to peace; peace is the way." In other words, bombing to achieve peace won't get you peace. Gandhi stressed that the means and the ends are inseparable. If we want a nonviolent world, we cannot get there by supporting invasion and occupation, nor even "lightly armed peacekeepers," as we often hear UN troops described.
...
In every violent contest, there is at least one loser and often the Pyrrhic nature of violent victory really creates two or more losers. In the end, we hope, we can continue to amass a growing success rate with nonviolence so that peace will become the default setting, at least human-to-human. Humanizing ourselves and all others is the first step toward victory with our opponents, creating partners where there used to be adversaries.
Discussion
Источник: https://citaty.su/aforizmy-i-citaty-maxatmy-gandi
То ли сам Ганди, то ли он цитировал Будду, если учесть комментарий Леси, но, как выяснилось для меня, это достаточное известное высказывание.