Apr 20, 2015 08:12
9 yrs ago
4 viewers *
French term
sans le fait reproché au prétendu responsable
French to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
case regarding product defect
I am finding it hard to word in English.....any advice appreciated
Proposed translations
(English)
Proposed translations
+2
2 hrs
AllegroTrans
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
Native in English
Specializes in field
United Kingdom
Sensible solutions
Native in: English (Variant: Wessexois) 
Works in: French to English, English, English to French
Related KudoZ points
:
1355
Selected
even in the absence of the matters alleged against the apparent tortfeasor (civil)/accused (crim.)
.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
-1
48 mins
in the absence of the act alleged against the accused
The same harm could have occurred in the absence of the act alleged against the accused.
caselaw.echr.globe24h.com/.../ekimdjiev-v-bulgaria-68532-47092-99.sh...
" ... applicant's case: discontinuation of criminal proceedings because the act alleged against the accused does not constitute a criminal offence."
https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=0702118125
Anthony S. Mathews - 1986 - Afrique du Sud - Politique et gouvernement - 1948-1961
"As in the case of terrorism, proof that the act alleged against the accused in the charge resulted in, or was likely to have ... "
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 48 mins (2015-04-20 09:01:12 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry about all the "A"s!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2015-04-20 09:35:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Of course, depending upon the case in question, it might be the defendant (civil) or respondant(matrimonial), rather than the "accused".
caselaw.echr.globe24h.com/.../ekimdjiev-v-bulgaria-68532-47092-99.sh...
" ... applicant's case: discontinuation of criminal proceedings because the act alleged against the accused does not constitute a criminal offence."
https://books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=0702118125
Anthony S. Mathews - 1986 - Afrique du Sud - Politique et gouvernement - 1948-1961
"As in the case of terrorism, proof that the act alleged against the accused in the charge resulted in, or was likely to have ... "
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 48 mins (2015-04-20 09:01:12 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry about all the "A"s!
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2015-04-20 09:35:23 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Of course, depending upon the case in question, it might be the defendant (civil) or respondant(matrimonial), rather than the "accused".
Peer comment(s):
| neutral |
writeaway
: your ref doesn't work. This should: http://caselaw.echr.globe24h.com/0/0/bulgaria/2005/03/03/eki...
59 mins
|
|
Thanks, yes that does work.
|
|
| disagree |
Daryo
: about the "accused" bit
1 hr
|
|
Why? See my note about alternatives if it is a civil or matrimonial case. This might be a criminal case if the product defect had serious consequences.
|
1 hr
without the charge against the alleged perpetrator
without, or excluding, or ignoring (putting aside)
Not at all my terrain but couldn't resist a shot at it.
Not at all my terrain but couldn't resist a shot at it.
Peer comment(s):
| neutral |
B D Finch
: It's not "without the charge", but if whatever they are alleged to have perpetrated had not occurred.
26 mins
|
| neutral |
AllegroTrans
: you are assuming this is a criminal case? What if it is a civil claim?
28 mins
|
2 hrs
notwithstanding the offence in respect with which the accused is charged
...notwithstanding the offence in respect with which the accused is charged, the same damage could have occurred.
Peer comment(s):
| neutral |
Tony M
: Again, the use of 'offence' appears to imply over-interpretation of this as a criminal case.
1 hr
|
3 hrs
but for the defendant's conduct
Courts analyze this issue by determining whether the plaintiff's injury would have occurred "but for" the defendant's conduct. If an injury would have occurred independent of the defendant's conduct, cause in fact has not been established, and no tort has been committed.
Discussion