Feb 26, 2011 06:02
13 yrs ago
3 viewers *
Japanese term
技術的範囲の属否
Japanese to English
Law/Patents
Patents
I want to know the exact term used for "属否" in patent jargon...Specific term please....no explanatory sentences!
Thanks!
Thanks!
Proposed translations
(English)
| 3 | infringement judgment |
CX159
|
| 5 +1 | whether [the subject article] falls under the technical scope |
Julian Rippon
|
| 1 -1 | does not fall under |
V N Ganesh
|
Proposed translations
1 day 8 hrs
Selected
infringement judgment
技術的範囲の属否（判定）（判断）のことだと思うので、
技術的範囲の属否判定（鑑定書）
侵害であると指摘された行為や製品が、当該特許発明の技術的範囲に属するか否かを客観的かつ冷静に判断する。
技術的範囲の属否判断（権利侵害かそうでないか）
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/patent/toyama/jitsumu/sosho_keikoku.h...
属否判断 infringement judgment
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40016395601
技術的範囲の属否判定（鑑定書）
侵害であると指摘された行為や製品が、当該特許発明の技術的範囲に属するか否かを客観的かつ冷静に判断する。
技術的範囲の属否判断（権利侵害かそうでないか）
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/patent/toyama/jitsumu/sosho_keikoku.h...
属否判断 infringement judgment
http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40016395601
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks. After confirmation with the client I went ahead with "Infringement judgment""
-1
1 hr
does not fall under
To demand a Hantei stating that the invention indicated in the drawing in question and its description does not fall under the technical scope of Patent no.○○○○.
www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/hantei.htm
www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/hantei.htm
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
Julian Rippon
: I disagree because I believe that 技術的範囲の「属否」 must be related to "whether or not" the device in question "falls under" the technical scope of the patent in question, rather than as is suggested by this answer stating that it doesn't fall under the scope.
16 hrs
|
+1
18 hrs
whether [the subject article] falls under the technical scope
This sentence is actually from the reference posted earlier by VN Ganesh. (With apologies to VNG for taking advantage of your work.)
"The Japan Patent Office, having a high degree of expertise regarding technology, design and goods, will render an official Hantei in a strictly neutral manner regarding whether the subject article falls under the technical scope of the patented invention in question within as soon as three months from the time of filing of theHantei demand." 1.(1)
www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/hantei.htm
The relevant part of this is "whether the subject article falls under the technical scope of the patented invention in question".
"The Japan Patent Office, having a high degree of expertise regarding technology, design and goods, will render an official Hantei in a strictly neutral manner regarding whether the subject article falls under the technical scope of the patented invention in question within as soon as three months from the time of filing of theHantei demand." 1.(1)
www.jpo.go.jp/tetuzuki_e/t_tokkyo_e/hantei.htm
The relevant part of this is "whether the subject article falls under the technical scope of the patented invention in question".
Peer comment(s):
| agree |
JapanLegal
: Yes, this is the correct interpretation, as the Japanese version of the explanation of the 判定制度 here should confirm: http://www.jpo.go.jp/cgi/link.cgi?url=/tetuzuki/sinpan/sinpa... . Since "属否" is really two words, there is no "specific term."
12 hrs
|
|
Thanks.
|
Something went wrong...