Portuguese term
e de
NOT SURE HOW TO PARSE THIS... ANY TIPS?
Based on an analysis of a dictionary with 2000 lexical elements, it is possible to propose the following generalizations regarding the interaction between tones, consonant sonority, and the syllabic structure of monomorphemic words and compounds, and suffixes:
| 5 +2 | and (tout court) |
María Leonor Acevedo-Miranda
|
| 5 | Not for points |
Muriel Vasconcellos
|
Non-PRO (1): Muriel Vasconcellos
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
Responsible, trustworthy and accurate
Native in: Portuguese (Variant: European/Portugal) 
, Spanish (Variant: Standard-Spain)
Works in: English to Portuguese, Spanish to Portuguese, Portuguese to Spanish, and 6 more.
and (tout court)
United States
Each translation a gem!
Native in: English (Variant: US)
Works in: Spanish to English, Portuguese to English
Not for points
Based on analysis of a dictionary with 2000 lexical ITEMS, it is possible to propose the following generalizations regarding the interaction between tones, consonant sonority, and the syllabic structure of monomorphemic words, compounds, and suffixes:
| Thanks, for some reason I had this term in my database, not sure how it got there. I appreciate your catching this. |
Something went wrong...