merkez

09:25 Jun 19, 2020 

Hi all!

Some of the proposed translations might be acceptable to some extend. (I was neutral to all, at least as of writing this comment.)

It can be clearly inferred from the explanations of two of them that the functionality was somehow prioritized when proposing a translation, which can ('should') be preferred in most cases.

However, if the asker is recommended (or he/she simply prefers) to pursue a functionalist approach (from the angle of 'skopos'* of translation), the context and the other elements (target readers, media, expectation of the commissioner etc.) (at least to some extend) should also be known, none of which are detailed in the question.

Thus, particularly but not limited to this specific case, we have nothing but just to rely on our presumptions about the missing parts, which might not fit the "requirement".

I do not expect the asker to reveal more, but suggest the asker to take this modest comment into account when deciding which proposed translation to use.

(*) You might wish to refer to skopos theory of translation.

Good luck!