GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
21:09 Nov 28, 2018 |
|
German to English translations [PRO] Law/Patents - Law (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Catherine Byers (X) United Kingdom Local time: 01:45 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +2 | Anchor Defendant |
| ||
5 | defendant domiciled in one of the member states |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Ankerbeklagter |
|
defendant domiciled in one of the member states Explanation: defendant domiciled in one of the member states Ich denke man kann es so umschreiben. According to art. 6 of the C O N V E N T I O N on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters: "A person domiciled in a Contracting State may also be sued: 1. where he is one of a number of defendants, in the courts for the place where any one of them is domiciled; 2. as a third party in an action on a warranty or guarantee or in any other third party proceedings, in the court seised of the original proceedings, unless these were instituted solely with the object of removing him from the jurisdiction of the court which would be competent in his case; 3. on a counter-claim arising from the same contract or facts on which the original claimwas based, in the court in which the original claim is pending; 4. in matters relating to a contract, if the action may be combined with an action against the same defendant in matters relating to rights in rem in immovable property, in the court of the Contracting State in which the property is situated10. Article 6 a11 Where by virtue of this Convention a court of a Contracting State has jurisdiction in actions relating to liability from the use or operation of a ship, that court, or any other court substituted for this purpose by the internal law of that State, shall also have jurisdiction over claims for limitation of such liability." https://curia.europa.eu/common/recdoc/convention/en/c-textes/brux-idx.htm |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Anchor Defendant Explanation: The identical phrase is used in English (see link to attached article by a respected UK law firm!) -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2018-11-28 23:46:47 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Re-posting broken link.... https://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2017/september/anchor-de... Reference: http://https://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2017/september/an... |
| |||||||||||||
Grading comment
| ||||||||||||||
|
10 mins |
Reference: Ankerbeklagter Reference information: Laut Eurolex. (siehe Link) Unter Punkt 56. Gemäß Art. 6 Nr. 1 der Brüssel I-Verordnung können sämtliche Klagen ein und desselben Klägers gegen eine Mehrzahl von Beklagten vor einem Gericht eines Mitgliedstaats, in dessen Bezirk sich der Wohnsitz ( 68 ) zumindest eines der Beklagten befindet, der hier als Ankerbeklagter bezeichnet werden soll, erhoben werden, allerdings unter dem Vorbehalt, dass zwischen diesen Klagen ein Zusammenhang besteht ( 69 ). Insoweit wird ausdrücklich verlangt, dass „zwischen den Klagen eine so enge Beziehung gegeben ist, dass eine gemeinsame Verhandlung und Entscheidung geboten erscheint, um zu vermeiden, dass in getrennten Verfahren widersprechende Entscheidungen ergehen könnten“ ( 70 ). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/DE/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62013CC0352 |
| ||
Note to reference poster
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.