00:25 Aug 12, 2014 |
French to English translations [PRO] Art/Literary - Philosophy | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | collective whole/aggregate/sum of its components |
| ||
2 | collective terms / concepts |
|
Summary of reference entries provided | |||
---|---|---|---|
Text |
|
Discussion entries: 8 | |
---|---|
collective terms / concepts Explanation: - |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
collective whole/aggregate/sum of its components Explanation: I wonder if "its aggregate" could work here as a concise alternative? OR Given the reference provided by BD Finch, I wonder if maybe a more interpretive solution like the following might do: "Neither praxis nor the sum of its components" |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
14 hrs |
Reference: Text Reference information: It seems as though your text may be based upon this: "Ni les théories socialistes, ni les théories libérales ne peuvent comprendre et organiser la co-création et la co-réalisation des subjectivités, sans les détruire, sans produire des effets anti-productifs. Ni la praxis et ses touts collectifs (tels la classe, la loi de la valeur, le travail) ni le paradigme libéral (avec son triptyque : liberté individuelle, marché et propriété), ne peuvent appréhender les conditions de constitution de la coopération entre cerveaux." -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 14 hrs (2014-08-12 14:35:31 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Before finding that, I had been about to post "collectivities" as an answer. However, that would not fit here. In fact it is difficult to see how class, the law of value, and labour can be validly described as "touts collectifs". Reference: http://seminaire.samizdat.net/spip.php?article23 |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.