objet immatériel

19:29 Sep 21, 2020 

Hello

I too have racked my brains over this.
I think the asker may be right in that it's dodgy drafting. After all, "dommage immatériel" is very common in insurance so it may be that the writer just wrote down "immatériels" without realising the conundrum it causes after "objets mobiliers"
It's really weird anyway as it stands

12:05 Sep 21, 2020 

Yes, makes sense. I'm not saying such objects don't exist, just wondering why one doesn't find objects immatériels (or perhaps biens immatériels) either here or in somewhere like Bridge.

And it says "objets immatériels *lui appartenant*", which perhaps (perhaps not) excludes the latter two items in your suggested list.

Adrian's "intangibles" may be better than "intangible objects". I'd be interested to know what someone with experience of the insurance industry thinks. Just all seems a bit odd.

10:41 Sep 21, 2020 

Suggestions:
* The work that went into producing knowledge embodied in paper or electronic documents;
* Software;
* Advantages directly flowing from the actual position of the premises, which would be lost while in temporary premises;
*Time involved in reinstating disrupted services and material property.