GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
14:42 Feb 28, 2019 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] Science - Medical (general) / acronyms and article | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 01:46 |
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 +4 | the EMA |
|
Discussion entries: 5 | |
---|---|
ema (e-em-ei) or ema? the EMA Explanation: Personally, I would always use the definite article, just as I would for 'the BBC' or 'the ESA' or 'the FDA' or 'the UN' But that doesn't mean in the same document I would say 'the NASA' — it seems to me that there are exceptions like 'NASA' where it has become accepted (and is pronounced) as a word in its own right, just like 'NATO' or 'UNESCO' or 'UNICEF' — it seems to me that a rule of thumb might be whether it is pronounced as a word, or is spelt out; I'm sure no-one ever calls it "eema" or "eesa". Sadly, I can immediately think of one exception to my own (entirely breakable!) rule of thumb, and that is the UK broadcasting sector ITV — there we spell it out as I.T.V. (we wouldn't say 'itva'!!); but, unlike the BBC, it is not a single body, but rather, a sector of the industry, and hence not strictly comparable. Taking another example from industry, but with no acronyms in sight, we would say 'the steel industry' but 'car manufacturing'. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 2 hrs (2019-02-28 16:46:22 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Phil kindly points out that the EMA itself omits the article; however, this is not uncommon on corporate websites, which often speak in a kind of 'royal we' first person. In any case, it is very much consistent with the kind of style typical of many websites, and indeed, slick modern journalism too. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 20 hrs (2019-03-01 11:40:03 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- @ Asker That's my point: there is little logic in the way we view plurals on currencies; no, I have never been asked for '5 pound' — but if I were, my immediate reaction would be a judgement about the person's educational level, as the singular is used within a certain social sphere. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||