unmarried from live birth

14:36 Mar 25, 2014 

It's got nothing to do with adoption or cloning. It simply means that stillborn children are not covered by this policy. Death cover does not extend to foetal death in this case. Some policies covering dependent children do pay out in the event of stillbirth. For example, the United States Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008, sec. 402, extended the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance to cover members' stillborn children.
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-110publ389/pdf/PLAW-110pub...

13:54 Mar 25, 2014 

Thank you all for your support. It helps me alot. Wish you all a nice day!

13:19 Mar 25, 2014 

Uhm, this is the part about the eligible child, in the "Voluntary Life/AD&D Insurance" section.

13:14 Mar 25, 2014 

unmarried and not cloned ;-]

12:51 Mar 25, 2014 

Victoria's suggestion would make sense, and I can't think of anything else that would. But it's a strange way of putting it.

12:38 Mar 25, 2014 

I was going to say "natural child", but that's apparently already covered. That being the case, I'm wondering whether this is a policy which pays out an amount upon the death of a child, but is specifying here that the coverage doesn't extend to still births.

12:23 Mar 25, 2014 

Maybe It is as Jack said. They classify many type of children here including natural child, stepchild, adopted child.

12:19 Mar 25, 2014 

The sentence is copied as it is from the text I am working on, so if there is a mistake, it must be by the writer. But even witn a comma addred, I still dont understand why it is "from live birth"

12:19 Mar 25, 2014 

I agree about the comma.

I had sort of assumed that "from live birth" meant 'as distinct from by adoption'?

12:14 Mar 25, 2014 

I'm pretty sure there should be a comma after "married", but even so: eligible children from live birth? How can there be any children, eligible or otherwise, from a still birth?