@ Asker 13:05 Mar 30, 2020
The crux of the matter, as BDF has so well explained, is what it is that these benefits overwhelm — and it is clearly "all opposition"; but this doesn't necessarily imply that this drug produces dramatically better results in the patients. Take an example: Drug A is equally effective as drugs B, C, and D at treating condition X — but unlike drugs B, C, and D, it avoids some particularly nasty side-effects. So one can fairly say that its benefits are 'overwhelming' on those grounds, even if it is not necessarily any (or significantly) more effective in its actual treatment. |