| Pages in topic: < [1 2] |
Idea: New type of thread ("Topic format"): Non-editable Thread poster: Katalin Horváth McClure
|
|---|
Maybe it could be like Kudoz postings, which can't be edited but only added to. I would favor implementing this for the forum in general (not making it merely optional).
Oh, and it should definitely include moderators and staff members.
[Edited at 2019-05-08 03:18 GMT]
| | | |
Lincoln Hui 
Hong Kong
Local time: 20:28
Member
Chinese to English
+ ...
| Less rules, not more | May 8, 2019 |
The "inclusive" format was a bad enough idea, we don't need to make the mistake twice. All this does is encourage the spelling/grammar trolls.
| | | |
Despite what I suggested above, I definitely agree with you. The so-called "inclusive" format should not be encouraged to spawn any further.
| | | |
| Altogether now: | May 8, 2019 |
Lincoln Hui wrote:
Less rules, not more
The "inclusive" format was a bad enough idea, we don't need to make the mistake twice. All this does is encourage the spelling/grammar trolls.
Fewer! 😂😂😂
| | |
|
|
|
Sheila Wilson
Spain
Local time: 13:28
Member (2007)
English
+ ...
Chris S wrote: Lincoln Hui wrote:
Less rules, not more
The "inclusive" format was a bad enough idea, we don't need to make the mistake twice. All this does is encourage the spelling/grammar trolls. Fewer! 😂😂😂
That's Tom's job! There's no room for two Toms here  !
| | | |
Sheila Wilson wrote: That's Tom's job! There's no room for two Toms here !
I'm just waiting for someone to correct my own error...
| | | |
Sheila Wilson
Spain
Local time: 13:28
Member (2007)
English
+ ...
| How much is it worth? | May 8, 2019 |
Chris S wrote:
I'm just waiting for someone to correct my own error...
Isn't that what we're all in business to do? You aren't really expecting a freebie, are you?
| | | |
Sheila Wilson wrote:
Isn't that what we're all in business to do? You aren't really expecting a freebie, are you?
Pop it on my tab with the craft beers
| | |
|
|
|
Sheila Wilson
Spain
Local time: 13:28
Member (2007)
English
+ ...
| That's ALTOGETHER reasonable of you | May 8, 2019 |
Chris S wrote: Sheila Wilson wrote:
Isn't that what we're all in business to do? You aren't really expecting a freebie, are you? Pop it on my tab with the craft beers
I can't do it for FEWER than two beers, mind.
Now - ALL TOGETHER -
Let's get back on topic!!! 
| | | |
Michele Fauble
United States
Local time: 05:28
Member (2006)
Norwegian to English
+ ...
| Grammar and logic | May 8, 2019 |
Fewer beers, less beer
More beers, more beer
[Edited at 2019-05-09 15:34 GMT]
| | | |
| should your idea not be possible... | May 9, 2019 |
... maybe at least making the * [edited at ... ] * note at the end of the post as compulsory would help?
It's been quite some time since I've been active here, so I may be mistaken, but I seem to remember that the post scriptum [edited at ...] can be removed before confirming the new version of a previous post. (I'll test here right after I post this).
If indeed the note can be removed, thus providing no indication that the post has been subsequently edited (whether f... See more ... maybe at least making the * [edited at ... ] * note at the end of the post as compulsory would help?
It's been quite some time since I've been active here, so I may be mistaken, but I seem to remember that the post scriptum [edited at ...] can be removed before confirming the new version of a previous post. (I'll test here right after I post this).
If indeed the note can be removed, thus providing no indication that the post has been subsequently edited (whether for a typo or for rephrasing a remark) any replies or comments published before such editing would risk being out of tune or off-topic.
'''''
edited 1.2.3. Test.
No, I guess I was mistaken. The [edited at...] is automatically placed.
.....
test edited again. If I reopen my post once again I can remove the first [edited at] though... Mmmm...
[Edited at 2019-05-09 13:38 GMT] ▲ Collapse
| | | |
| Pages in topic: < [1 2] |
Login to reply/comment 
