This site uses cookies.
Some of these cookies are essential to the operation of the site,
while others help to improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.
For more information, please see the ProZ.com privacy policy.
Would you consider my suggestions for improving the LWA feedback system
[1] Some clients make excuse about quality after 60 or 90 days. They use it as excuse not to pay. And in such cases, if service provider makes entry of non payment on blueboard of client, entry is removed saying that client raised a quality complaint. If any client does not report any quality issue with file within 30 days of delivery, such clients are normally raising false quality issues at time of payment. N... See more
Would you consider my suggestions for improving the LWA feedback system
[1] Some clients make excuse about quality after 60 or 90 days. They use it as excuse not to pay. And in such cases, if service provider makes entry of non payment on blueboard of client, entry is removed saying that client raised a quality complaint. If any client does not report any quality issue with file within 30 days of delivery, such clients are normally raising false quality issues at time of payment. Negative blueboard entry for such clients should not be removed.
[2] Some clients make issue that delivered translation is google translation and use it as excuse not to pay at all. If service provider can provide evidence that delivered translation was not google translation, negative blueboard entry (for non payment) for such clients should not be removed if they raise issue about it. ▲ Collapse
Subject:
Comment:
The contents of this post will automatically be included in the ticket generated. Please add any additional comments or explanation (optional)
Alejandro Cavalitto Argentina Local time: 14:42 Member (2008) English to Spanish + ...
Those situations are considered by site rules
Nov 7, 2013
Hello,
Please note that Blue Board rule #2, http://www.proz.com/siterules/blue_board_bb_blueboard/2#2 , reads: "Entries concerning the Likelihood of Working Again (LWA) with given outsourcers are allowed only when (1) commissioned work has been completed in full and delivered on time, and (2) there have not been complaints related to quality shortly after deliv... See more
Hello,
Please note that Blue Board rule #2, http://www.proz.com/siterules/blue_board_bb_blueboard/2#2 , reads: "Entries concerning the Likelihood of Working Again (LWA) with given outsourcers are allowed only when (1) commissioned work has been completed in full and delivered on time, and (2) there have not been complaints related to quality shortly after delivery. Entries may not be made on the basis of negotiations, test translations, or other preliminary or non-commissioned interactions".
Complaints raised several months after a job is delivered would not prevent a service provider from posting an LWA feedback entry.
If there was a complaint related to quality shortly after delivery of a translation, it is irrelevant for the purposes of applying site rules if the translation is the result of a machine translation or not. As long as the complaint exists, an LWA feedback entry would violate the rule quoted above and would not be allowed.
Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
Manage your TMs and Terms ... and boost your translation business
Are you ready for something fresh in the industry? TM-Town is a unique new site for you -- the freelance translator -- to store, manage and share translation memories (TMs) and glossaries...and potentially meet new clients on the basis of your prior work.